More Profundity from David Brooks

Jonathan Sacks

New York Times columnist David Brooks says in "The Week Trump Won" that America was founded on a (however oxymoronic) "secular religion" that held that "the heart of society was in the covenantal realm: 'marriages, families, congregations, communities, charities and voluntary associations'," exactly as Rabbi Jonathan Sacks has recently pointed out. These are, Sacks says, values that derive from the Hebrew Bible, a.k.a. the Old Testament.

"America’s Judeo-Christian ethic," Brooks points out, "celebrated neighborliness over pagan combativeness; humility as the basis of good character, not narcissism. It believed in taking in the stranger because we were all strangers once. It dreamed of universal democracy as the global fulfillment of the providential plan."

The presidency of Donald Trump represents a complete upending of this foundational idea. Sacks has noted, "Today, one half of America is losing all [their erstwhile] covenantal institutions. It’s losing strong marriages and families and communities. It is losing a strong sense of the American narrative. It’s even losing e pluribus unum because today everyone prefers pluribus to unum ... ."

Don't miss reading Brook's full column about this ugly turn of events!

Has Change Come Too Fast?

Michael Gerson

Center-right Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson writes, in "The issue that is — unfortunately — uniting Americans on the left and the right," that Americans are mostly of one accord today ...

... in their belief that the United States is dominated by corrupt, self-serving elites. They are united in their call for radical rather than incremental change. While disagreeing deeply about the cause, they see America as careening off course. Little wonder that Americans consistently say their country in on the wrong track by a margin of more than 2-to-1. Disgruntlement is our nation’s common ground.

I think the disgruntlement stems from progressive changes happening too fast over the course of the last few years or decades.

I say this as a progressive Democrat who likes the progress we've made during the 70 years I've been around. To paraphrase Barack Obama: "[Each] successive generation [has indeed looked] upon our imperfections and decide[d] that it is in our power to remake this nation to more closely align with our highest ideals." Among the good things that have happened:

• We've seen African Americans and other people of color get a fairer deal, in large part because of federal laws banning discrimination and ensuring voting rights.
• We've witnessed women's gains in self-determination in our once-patriarchal society, due primarily to the liberation movement that began with the rise of second wave feminism in the 1960s.
• Our world is now one in which the once generally mandated restrictions on individual sexual behavior have been lifted, thanks largely to the Sexual Revolution of that same decade.
• We've progressed from a society of LGBT intolerance to one in which gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgender people don't have to hide their sexual and gender identities.
• We now have a society in which everyone is truly free to practice the religion he or she prefers, or no religion at all.

These and others like them were epochal changes that happened stunningly fast.

Too fast, I think. There has been backlash. When epochal changes follow one another too rapidly, the culture gets indigestion. There are now just too many dyspeptic citizens who feel cruelly trampled over. They are the ones who voted a candidate like Donald Trump into the White House. Some of them even show their disgruntlement by painting swastikas and rallying for white supremacy.

So I think progressive change now needs to take a long nap. That's the only way we can bring people back together over something positive, rather than just over shared disgruntlement. It's the only way the center of our culture can begin to hold once more.

Faith and Trust ... and Gun Violence

An article by historian Randolph Ross in today's Washington Post has it that there is a long historical connection between rises in people's tendency toward committing deadly acts of violence and people's having lost faith and trust in government. "How the erosion of trust leads to murders and mass shootings" details the way in which, as trust dissipates, killings rise.

Americans' trust in governmental leaders is at a low ebb. We've just seen, in Las Vegas, the worst mass shooting in our history. There's a connection, Roth maintains.

A makeshift memorial to those killed by Stephen Paddock
at the Route 91 Harvest Festival in Las Vegas.

This doesn't come as a big surprise. Whenever Americans have faith in those who lead them, each feels as if he or she comprises a distinct thread in a common flag.

Whether one is a red thread or a blue thread, each of us is best off when he or she knows it takes both colors to make an American flag.

We've lost that sense of unity today. What can we do to restore it? I think all of us need to work harder at restoring our one-time mutual dedication to civility.

According to the thesaurus, words closely related to civility include ...

... honors; ceremony, observance, rite, ritual; decorum, etiquette, form, manners, mores, proprieties; ... regards, respects; favor, grace, kindliness, kindness; protocol, rules

Let's all think about words like those and try to implement them in our lives once again! It may help put an end to all these unconscionable acts of deadly gun violence ...

Remembering Hugh Hefner and the Advent of Playboy

Hugh Hefner in 1966

Hugh Hefner has died. As the founder of Playboy magazine in 1953, Hef changed the world. By the time of his death last week at age 91, he was no longer much of a factor in the culture. The culture had moved well past what he'd once meant to it, back in the day.

I expect my father was one of the original subscribers to Playboy. I don't really remember for sure, though, whether he had the first issue, that of December 1953, with Marilyn Monroe on the cover:

The December 1953 premiere
issue of Playboy

I was only six years old at the time, but by the time I was nine or ten, Dad was letting me peruse the Playboy issues stacked up on a shelf in our house.

I didn't understand then how radical Playboy was. I realized, of course, that photos of buxom young women in the nude were its main attraction, but I didn't know that just a few years prior, no mass-circulation magazine would ever have tried that.

After Hef died, Washington Post columnist Alyssa Rosenberg wrote:

On some major social issues, Hefner was early to take what are today mainstream progressive stances. ... Hefner was an early and avid defender of the gay rights movement, arguing that sexual liberation had to include gay people, too, in order for it to be meaningful. The same instincts led Hefner to publish extensive coverage of the emerging AIDS epidemic, recognizing that a sexually transmitted disease had no sexual orientation.

Hefner threw racially integrated parties in decades when it was not always popular to do so. Playboy picked its first black Playmate in 1965. And his magazine helped jump-start the writer Alex Haley’s career by asking him to interview Miles Davis, and Playboy then gave Haley an entire series, which eventually would include important interviews with Malcolm X and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. 

But her praise was not unalloyed:

Hefner may have advocated for women’s equality and independence in the political sphere. But that ideal state of affairs never arrived in Hefner’s lifetime, despite his advocacy for it. And Hefner’s own relationships were not necessarily defined by an equal balance of power.

New York Times columnist Ross Douthat was downright scathing:

Hugh Hefner, gone to his reward at the age of 91, was a pornographer and chauvinist who got rich on masturbation, consumerism and the exploitation of women, aged into a leering grotesque in a captain’s hat, and died a pack rat in a decaying manse where porn blared during his pathetic orgies.

Hef was the grinning pimp of the sexual revolution, with quaaludes for the ladies and Viagra for himself — a father of smut addictions and eating disorders, abortions and divorce and syphilis, a pretentious huckster who published Updike stories no one read while doing flesh procurement for celebrities, a revolutionary whose revolution chiefly benefited men much like himself.

That's unseemly and unfair. It misreads the Hefner legacy by judging it by the feminist and post-feminist standards of today — an ethos that could not have emerged at all in the 1960s absent what Hef did in the 1950s.

In 1948, researcher Alfred C. Kinsey and two other authors published the first of two "Kinsey Reports." Called Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, it would be followed in 1953 by Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.

These reports documented statistical studies that Kinsey undertook to find out what sorts of sexual behavior people were actually engaging in. The reports showed that in addition to the licit types of sexual behavior, there was a surprising amount of nominally illicit sex of various types going on.

My parents kept a copy of at least the Human Male report on a bookshelf, and at some point in my late childhood or early adolescence I pulled it off the shelf and looked it over. I doubt I understood much of it, but I did at least realize that it was telling the world about the ubiquity of sexual expression in our culture.

By 1960, when the first birth control pill was introduced, we were embarking on a sexual revolution, thanks in part to Alfred Kinsey and High Hefner.

Betty Friedan

In 1963, Betty Friedan published her groundbreaking book The Feminine Mystique. Challenging the widely shared belief in the 1950s that "fulfillment as a woman had only one definition for American women after 1949 — the housewife-mother," it sparked the rise of "second-wave" feminism in the U.S (see the Wikipedia article here).

By the late 1960s, Friedan's second-wave feminism was rocketing skyward among my female age peers. There was a supposed "bra burning" in 1969 that protested the Miss America contest in Atlantic City, Apparently, no bras were actually burned, but the event nonetheless ushered in an era in which feminists would conscientiously refuse to wear bras.

In 1973, Playgirl magazine appeared:

First Playgirl issue, June 1973

It, too, had a centerfold. The first one was Lyle Waggoner, of the "Carol Burnett Show" on TV:

Lyle Waggoner as the first
Playgirl centerfold

So it was a time when sexual liberation and feminism were intertwined. That's not so true now ... but I think the late Hugh Hefner is owed a vote of thanks, anyway!